To examine the influence of their hoof trimming strategies on hoof health, herds participating in phase 1 of the Alberta Dairy Hoof Health Project were classified according to whether they did whole-herd or partial-herd trims. On farms with partial-herd trims, prevalences of the most common lesions were higher than on farms with whole-herd trims.
To control digital dermatitis (DD), M2-stage lesions need to be treated as soon as possible after they are detected. Waiting more than a few days for the next time the trimmer is scheduled to visit will never get DD under control. Several studies have examined the accuracy of DD detection in the milking parlour compared with lifting feet in a trim chute. Results suggest that inspection of heels in the parlour using a simple mirror and headlamp is a viable option for routinely monitoring DD lesions.
Researchers at the University of Wisconsin reported that heifers with pre-partum digital dermatitis (DD) had lower milk production, poorer conception to first service, longer days open and were more likely to have multiple cases of DD. Those researchers recommended that a DD control program should be a priority for pregnant heifers. But before a control program can be implemented, a reliable method of detecting DD in these animals is required. At the 2016 Western Canadian Dairy Seminar, University of Calgary graduate student Casey Jacobs described how she used ‘pen walks’ to detect DD in pre-calf heifers.
In his past 30 years of hoof trimming, Vic Daniel has seen digital dermatitis (DD) become by far the most common hoof lesion in his clients’ herds. Vic has kept detailed records of the claws he has trimmed—for the past 7 years using the Hoof Supervisor® lesion recording system. Here are what Vic has concluded are the main risk factors for DD.
Researchers at the University of Wisconsin evaluated the hoof health of 719 heifers for 6 months prior to first calving. In the subsequent lactation, heifers with pre-partum digital dermatitis (DD) had lower milk production, poorer conception to first service, longer days open and were more likely to have multiple cases of DD.
Non-healing (nh) bovine hoof horn lesions, characterized by penetration of the horn capsule and association with white line disease (nhWLD) and sole ulcers (nhSU) are frequently encountered in dairy herds endemically affected by digital dermatitis (DD). Lesions of this type are associated with more severe lameness, often leading to claw amputation or slaughter and they respond poorly to standard DD treatment. Researchers in Austria recently described a successful therapy for such lesions.
Zinpro has recently released a new DD Check App that facilitates recording of DD lesions across an entire group of animals. Once the required information on individual cows has been entered, a ‘DD Infection Model’ can be used to summarize DD infection status and predict future outbreaks.
In an interview with the veterinary journal InPractice, renowned dairy hoof health specialist Roger Blowey discusses cattle lameness and current thinking about the causes and control of digital dermatitis (DD).
The British Columbia Dairy Hoof Health Group has created HARP-DD (Hoof Assessment and Recommended Practices for Digital Dermatitis Control), a risk assessment tool aimed at helping to reduce the prevalence of digital dermatitis (DD) by identifying and addressing on-farm risk factors for infection.
Few claims about the efficacy of products used to treat digital dermatitis (DD) are supported by any conclusive scientific evidence. Not all treatment trials provide conclusive evidence – many reported trials are poorly designed, leading to bias towards a particular outcome.
A recent study considered a large number of DD treatment trials, eliminating all but four that were rigorously designed to give conclusive, unbiased results.